Did James Comey’s Document Leaks Violate The FBI Employment Agreement?

Did James Comey’s Document Leaks Violate The FBI Employment Agreement?

Skip to comments.

Did James Comey’s Document Leaks Violate The FBI Employment Agreement?
The Federalist ^ | 6/9/17 | Bre Peyton

Posted on 06/10/2017 4:24:46 AM PDT by markomalley

During his testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, former FBI director James Comey revealed that he was the source of leaked memos about his conversations with Donald Trump surrounding the Russia investigation. Comey explained that he shared the memos with his friend, a professor at Columbia University, who then shared them with the New York Times, actions that may violate the FBI’s own employee agreement.

“My judgment was I needed to get [the memos] out into the public square,” Comey said. “So I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter. I didn’t do it myself for a variety of reasons, but I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel.”

By his own account, it seems that Comey may not have followed the agency’s employee agreement, which places numerous restrictions on the use of information or documents acquired during an individual’s employment by the FBI. Paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 of the FBI employment agreement appear to cover Comey’s distribution of content he says he created on government property in his capacity as a government official:

Paragraph 2 states that all materials acquired in connection with an employee’s official duties are property of the U.S. government and that such materials must be surrendered to the FBI upon an employee’s separation from the agency. Paragraph 3 states that employees are prohibited from releasing “any information acquired by virtue of my official employment” to “unauthorized individual[s] without prior official written authorization by the FBI.” Paragraph 4 of the agreement requires FBI employees, prior to disclosing or publishing information acquired during their employment, to submit the information to FBI authorities for review to determine whether it is authorized for public release.

So if Comey followed protocol and surrendered all government property, including the memos he produced in his capacity as an FBI employee, it would have been impossible for him to provide the memos to his friend. The fact that he was able to provide hard copies of the memos to both his friend and special counsel Robert Mueller suggests that Comey did not surrender them to authorities as required by the FBI employment agreement.

Page two of the agreement lists the types of information disclosures which are strictly prohibited. Included in the list of information that may not be released without prior written approval by the FBI is “information that relates to any sensitive operational details or the substantive merits of any ongoing or open investigation or case.” While the agreement states that unauthorized disclosure of classified information is a violation of the contract, information does not have to be classified in order to be prohibited from unauthorized disclosure. Comey claims that his memos were unclassified.

Comey’s claim that it would not have been proper to publicly disclose that Trump was not a target of any FBI investigation because the investigation was ongoing and facts could change flies in the face of his decision to provide to his friends records of his meetings about the investigation with the president. If he could not publicly note that Trump was not a target of an ongoing investigation, then why was he able to release FBI records related to that investigation to his friends for the purpose of having those details leaked to the public via the news media? In light of the FBI’s prohibition on publicly sharing documents or information related to ongoing investigations absent prior written authorization, Comey’s dual explanations make little sense.

The FBI employment agreement states that violating any of the included terms may result in termination, civil liability, revocation of security clearances, or even criminal sanctions.

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government

Woo hoo! Working on the last $10k! Let’s git ‘er done!

Please click our new secure link https://freerepublic.com/donate/ and make your donation count today.

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC – PO Box 9771 – Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much!

To: markomalley

When mommy taught James to share, I don’t think this is what she meant.

To: markomalley

Yesterday on FOX it was unclear whether a FBI Director himself is required to sign one of these employment agreements and if Comey did sign one, where is it?

3 posted on 06/10/2017 4:34:53 AM PDT by donozark (JAMES COMEY: Democrat Presidential candidate 2020.)

To: markomalley

I think it might violate the espionage act. And I don’t give a rat’s rear end if he didn’t know if it was wrong or not.

4 posted on 06/10/2017 4:35:16 AM PDT by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD….And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)

To: markomalley

Comey is now claiming he no longer has the original memo. So we really don’t know if it had any classified information in it or not. He says he gave it to the Prof who is now in hiding.

5 posted on 06/10/2017 4:45:52 AM PDT by weston (SO HERE’S THE STORY: As far as I’m concerned, it’s Christ or nothing!)

To: markomalley

He didn’t follow any protocol. He’s a political hack. He justified not following any “whistleblower” avenue that he knows is open, call the WH Counsel, inform the AG, etc.

Comey leaked to the public for exactly the same reason that Reality Winner did. “Get Trump.”

6 posted on 06/10/2017 4:49:48 AM PDT by Cboldt

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

This post originally appeared on Free Republic


Leave a Reply