Underclothes That Display The 4th Amendment When X-Rayed by TSA

Underclothes That Display The 4th Amendment When X-Rayed by TSA

Skip to comments.

Underclothes That Display The 4th Amendment When X-Rayed by TSA
Laughing Squid ^ | 29NOV10 | Scott Beale

Posted on 04/24/2017 10:08:23 PM PDT by vannrox

4th Amendment Wear is a series of underclothes that have the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution printed on them with metallic ink that so that it will show up when worn through a TSA X-Ray machine.

The clothes are designed as a silent protest against the new reality of being searched to the point where we’re basically naked. We don’t intend for this to be anything more than a thought-provoking way to fuel the debate about safety vs. civil liberties. If we sell a few items, great. But the main intention is to open more dialogue. It’s more of a conceptual piece than anything else.

(Excerpt) Read more at laughingsquid.com

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 4th; amendment; clothing; peakoil; tsa

Monthly donors needed! We currently have some very generous FReeper sponsors kicking in an additional $10 for each new monthly donor. Help end FReepathons. Sign up to be a monthly donor today! Thank you very much!

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC – PO Box 9771 – Fresno, CA 93794

1 posted on 04/24/2017 10:08:23 PM PDT by vannrox

To: vannrox

Great idea. Thanks for post.

2 posted on 04/24/2017 10:09:43 PM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))

To: vannrox

I have been through enough airports to suspect that at some, this will be grounds to get you specially search and/or refused boarding.

3 posted on 04/24/2017 10:15:06 PM PDT by arthurus

To: vannrox

Was recently herded into one of the L3 millimeter wave scanning machines at a Western US airport by an African immigrant wearing a TSA uniform.

I can recall when an individual like him would have stood out like a sore thumb in that city, because 40 years ago, no one had ever seen anyone like that there.

But there he was, ordering the Americans around, and of course, if you said “do you think this is Constitutional?” he would have snarled and said “I don’t geev a damn about jor Constitution, just move”.

Isn’t it wonderful that we are now nothing but cattle to be kicked around by foreigners most likely of the Muslim persuasion?

And isn’t it a bit like being in an insane asylum, where the inmates are running it?



4 posted on 04/24/2017 10:17:58 PM PDT by Regulator

To: vannrox


5 posted on 04/24/2017 10:29:00 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (patriots win, Communists and Socialist Just-Us Warriors lose)

To: vannrox

It doesn’t pay to draw more attention to oneself while in the shadow of the TSA baton.
There should be better ways.
If one does choose this form of activism, God bless you.
Just be very sure to have at least two people filming it from different angles and have a couple of unafraid lawyers ready to aggressively defend you.
Do not, repeat, DO NOT rely on TSA ‘seeing the light’ of your logic and suddenly share a can of Pepsi.

To: vannrox

I think this is excellent.

7 posted on 04/24/2017 10:31:04 PM PDT by Yaelle

To: vannrox

I want the Second Amendment printed on boxer shorts.

With an artistically placed assault rifle.

8 posted on 04/24/2017 10:38:27 PM PDT by Ciaphas Cain (The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)

To: lee martell

“…shadow of the TSA baton…”

Yep, those poorly-educated knuckle-draggers were flipping burgers last week and now know you’re trying to catch a plane in a half-hour.
How much am I willing to bet they would ensure the “additional questioning” would take forty minutes?
9 posted on 04/24/2017 10:51:57 PM PDT by Blue Jays ( Rock hard ~ Ride free)

To: vannrox

10 posted on 04/24/2017 11:08:17 PM PDT by Daaave (“The flesh eating jinn of Komari”)

To: lee martell

“It doesn’t pay to draw more attention to oneself while in the shadow of the TSA baton.”

I don’t know, I thought the woman who showed up at O’Hare wearing only erotic looking underwear under her over coat was a pretty funny response. If I remember right she said something like, “If TSA get’s to look so does everyone else.”

I wonder if United would seat me if I tried to board a plane wearing only a speedo and flip flops?

11 posted on 04/24/2017 11:08:43 PM PDT by Fai Mao (I still want to see The PIAPS in prison)

To: vannrox

It’s the price of national cowardice.

There were the choices of going to war against nations sponsoring terrorism or of turning our nation into a police state in an effort toward civilian police detection of foreign enemy threats.

Our nation has no will to fight, so the decision was made to routinely search Americans and the personal effects of Americans in an effort to detect whatever kinds of lawbreaking.

12 posted on 04/24/2017 11:10:41 PM PDT by familyop (“Welcome to Costco. I love you.” –Costco greeter in the movie, “Idiocracy”)

To: vannrox

For some reason it reminds me of some retard spending $30 for a Che T-shirt.

To: vannrox

It won’t make any difference in a few years anyway. Only military personnel will be flying then.

14 posted on 04/24/2017 11:15:32 PM PDT by familyop (“Welcome to Costco. I love you.” –Costco greeter in the movie, “Idiocracy”)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

This post originally appeared on Free Republic


Leave a Reply